| Line 3 was replaced by lines 3-4 |
| - The following are the Usecases the terrestrial working group discussed during the July 2007 REAP Requirements Workshop. |
| + The following are the Usecases the terrestrial working group discussed during the July 2007 REAP Requirements Workshop. |
| + The group also conducted some informal ranking of these. First, usescases were given a 1-3 importance ranking, with 1 being most important. Second, of those cases ranked 1, group members voted for a few they felt were most important or should be implemented first. |
| Line 5 was replaced by line 6 |
| - \\__1)__ |
| + \\__1)__ Importance: 1, votes: 4 |
| Line 108 was replaced by line 109 |
| - \\__4)__ |
| + \\__4)__Importance: 1, votes: 5 |
| Line 213 was replaced by line 214 |
| - \\__7)__ |
| + \\__7)__Importance: 1, votes: 2 |
| Line 316 was replaced by line 317 |
| - \\__12)__ |
| + \\__12)__Importance: 1, votes: 1 |
| At line 352 added 19 lines. |
| + ---- |
| + \\__13)__ Importance: 1, votes: 1 |
| + \\__Use Case Name__: Workflows need to accommodate sub-workflows that operate at different frequencies |
| + |
| + \\__Version:__ |
| + \\__Summary:__ |
| + \\__Preconditions:__ |
| + \\__Triggers:__ |
| + \\__Basic course of events:__ |
| + \\__Alternative paths:__ |
| + \\__Postconditions:__ |
| + \\__Business rules:__ |
| + \\__Notes:__ |
| + \\__Author and date:__ |
| + |
| + |
| + |
| + \\ |
| + |
| Line 355 was replaced by line 375 |
| - \\__14)__ |
| + \\__14)__Importance: 1, votes: 4 |
