|
This is version 2.
It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited.
[Back to current version]
[Restore this version]
Aug 13, 2008
Participants: Altintas, Barseghian, Crawl, Jones, Ludäscher, Potter, Schildhauer, Schultz, Wang
- barseghian
- added a provenance class to just write tokens to disk (an attempt at 'intermediate data products'), usefulness debatable, probably won't pursue
- 'archive end-to-end run' usecase - looking at old smart rerun code as part of the alternative path, trouble getting it to work
- conclusion: focus on getting 'archive a complete end to end run' done, delay smart rerun for now
- hoping to move Baskett Slough station to HJ Andrews, discussing with Andrews people
- todo: email out request for additions to EIM paper, and where these might go
- crawl
- ocean usecase, now in one workflow.
- todo: get peter's input on where we're going with this, and its usefulness
- general kepler discussion of workflow hierarchical depth and difficulty with keeping track of where one is at. Should, in general, depth be limited to 2 levels?
- working on EIM sst poster with Ilkay.
- wang
- requesting more detailed usecase for detached / dist. execution wf. currently looking at HosseiniSimulationWorkflow as one example
- todo: post paper of plans for detached and distributed execution usecase
|
